Skip to main content

Featured

Story of Operation Gibraltar (1965)

Mohtarma Fatima Jinnah asked a question to President General Ayub Khan in 1964. She asked that American military aid to India was the talk of the town. And India would use this aid against Pakistan. "I want to know how it happened." America was your friend. Why did you lose this friend? Everyone living in the East and the West Pakistan wanted to get the answer to this question. This question came up in the early era of Ayub Khan when industrial development was fast taking place. Now it had become clear that this progress was due to Pakistan's support to America against Russia. In return Pakistan had secured economic aid from America. This aid was being spent on the construction of Tarbela, Mangla dams and many other projects. But the Indo-China war in 1962, changed the scenario. America turned its face on Pakistan and started to give military aid to India. On the one side, America was giving military aid to India on the other, India was annexing Kashmir to its territo

Fascism and Mussolini

 



When people use the terms "fascism" or "fascist" today, they're usually using it in a derogatory way to refer to a group, a regime, or even an individual that is overly aggressive, and controlling, and totalitarian. But its roots, actually, lie with Benito Mussolini, who was in power in Italy during the The 1920s, and 1930s, and through World War II, and they proudly call themselves the Fascists and their ideology as fascism.

The root of fascist and fascism come from the Italian word "fascia," which literally refers to a bundle. It comes out of this idea that a bundle of things will be stronger together than individually.

 


This is actually the symbol for fascism, and this symbol of this bundle, this sheath of sticks, this actually predates Mussolini by thousands of years. It goes back to Roman times, and even, based on some of the things I've read, even predates Roman times as a symbol of unity, a symbol of official strength.

Even before Mussolini came around, the term was used by many groups that viewed themselves as a league of revolutionaries. A group of people somehow fighting for change, And Mussolini was no different. When in the end of 1914 and then in early 1915, he establishes the Fasci d'Azione Rivoluzionaria, this literally translates to group action revolutionary, or the revolutionary action group, founded by Mussolini in 1915.

It was really a splinter of the Socialist Party. Well, there's an irony there because Mussolini and fascism, in particular, is associated with strongly anti-socialist ideology. But as Europe was entering into World War I in 1914, some of the mainstream of the Italian Socialist Party was against Italy entering the war.

They wanted Italy to maintain their neutrality, but splinter groups, more nationalist groups that said, this is Italy's chance to claim its right. It should join the war on the side of the Entente and Mussolini was one of these individuals. Because of his strong pro-war stance, he was actually kicked out of his, he was head of a socialist paper in 1914.

Then he eventually, by 1915, establishes the Fasci d'Azione Rivoluzionaria, and by the end of World War I in 1919, it regroups under the name Fasci Italiani di Combattimento. So this literally translates as, you could view Fasci as a group, or league, or revolutionary league of Italians of Combatants.



Or the Combatant Italian Revolutionary Group, the Group of Italian Combatants, is another way to think about it, and their ideology wasn't well established right when they set up. It was just really around this idea of being super pro-nationalist, but it began to develop over the course of the '20s and the 1930s.

The core idea is an extreme nationalism. And when we talk about extreme nationalism, or nationalism in general, it's talking about the interests of one nation, of one group, above all others about putting the state above all other things.

Oftentimes, fascism is viewed as a right-wing group. But in its purest form, it's neither left- or right-wing. At the left end of the spectrum, you could imagine communist or socialism. Communism, which could view as an extreme form of socialism.

Communism, and at the extreme right, you could imagine just complete free-market. Complete, unfettered, free-market. Ultra small government. Fascists and extreme nationalists, they didn't view themselves as either end of the spectrum. They kind of viewed themselves as a separate way where everything was subordinate.

The economy itself was subordinate to the state. Now with that said, they tended to align themselves more with folks on the right. So even though they weren't completely free-market capitalists, they were staunchly anti-communist and anti-socialist, which caused them to form alliances a little bit more with the right.

From their point of view, it wasn't one of these extreme right-wing ideologies that the government should be subordinate to the economy that the government should be as small as possible. It was much more that the economy was there to serve national interests. Some of the other ideologies that the fascists began to hold is this idea that force was a legitimate part of politics. So force in politics when Benito Mussolini's fascists, through the use of the Black Shirts, which was their paramilitary group, which allowed them to eventually take political control and enforce political control.

We later see it with other groups like the Nazis, Who are also tended to be associated with fascism, their storm troopers and their storm battalions, their paramilitary forces, that are used to, essentially, take political control.

The other aspect of them is that they weren't really fans of democracy, Not only did they think that everything should be subordinate to the state, but that the state should have absolute control. So it's not about democracy. It's about having a strong leader at the top, a strong one party at the top, and in the case of Mussolini it was the fascists.

In the case of Hitler it ends up being the Nazis. So totalitarian is idea of aggressive foreign policy, this aggressive foreign policy is really rooted in this belief of cultural superiority. In the case of the Nazis, belief in extreme racial superiority, cultural superiority. In Mussolini's eyes, he was actually quite disparaging. Even though Hitler looked to Mussolini as something of a role model when Mussolini took powe in 1922, it inspired Hitler's Beer Hall Putsch.

Mussolini did not think much of Hitler through much of the 1920s and even early 1930s. He thought Hitler's ideas of racial purity were really an illusion. That there was no racially pure race. He didn't really appreciate Hitler calling the Italians a mongrel race, But Mussolini himself did think that the Italians were culturally superior. That would be their justification for an aggressive foreign policy. For them taking over other territory in Europe and in Africa, and because they shared so much in common ideologically, the Nazis were kind of view as a more extreme form. The fascists themselves were quite extreme But the Nazis were a more extreme form of the same ideology.

They will, even though in the '20s and early '30s Mussolini is more eager to align himself with some of the other powers in Europe, in particular Great Britain and France. In the second half of 1930s, Mussolini and Hitler find themselves to be kindred spirits. They both want to be aggressive in their foreign policy. They both want to secure other territory. They both have this idea that they need space for their superior populations, to their culturally superior, and in the case of the Nazis, racially superior populations to grow and thrive.



In the second half of the 1930s and World War II, you have Mussolini and the fascists become close allies of Hitler and the Nazis.



Also, Know about:

Hazrat Umar bin Abdul Aziz (رحمة الله عليه)

How did Hitler rise to power?

Second Mughal Emperor Humayun

Julius Caesar - Greatest Conqueror Ever?

Who Was Karl Marx (Part 01)

Popular Posts